As far as the camera itself it takes great pictures. I've had great luck with the trigger speed and night time pictures clarity. I had planned on setting up a system to remotely gather my pictures from cameras operating in sensitive remote areas of farms I manage. By using their cuddelink technology I thought that I would be able to remotely pull photograph data from these remote areas without leaving my scent everywhere. For the most part these cameras did a average job. If I were to rank their individual qualities on a scale of 1-10 I would come up with the following.
Daytime Picture Quality - 8
Night Picture Quality - 7
Trigger Speed - 8
Ease of Connectivity - 5
Battery Life - 3
As you can see one of the biggest downfalls of the current cuddelink technology is the high consumption rate of batteries even while using Energizer Lithium batteries. I don't know if these cameras could even last a month using standard energizer or duracell batteries using my settings for picture delay etc... Perhaps as new software develops and these cameras get updated firmware they will improve but currently trying to use them to stay out of areas while checking cameras they require entry the area every month or so just to change batteries. The final complaint I have with these cameras is the setup process for the cuddelink system. I'm fairly computer/technology savvy and I don't feel the setup process is even close to what I would call intuitive. I commend Cuddelink on a novel idea and I love the mesh network theory so once they find solutions to the couple issues they currently have I think this will be a game changer in the deer management world.